The general sentiment around Civilization VII is polarized, with players drawn to the addictiveness of its core gameplay and innovative elements like the age system, despite frustrations with the UI/UX and an incomplete feel. While the visuals and music are highly praised, there is a strong backlash against prevalent bugs and AI inconsistencies. Additionally, the game’s monetization approach has been met with criticism, with players feeling the game is an ongoing development requiring further enhancement. The introduction of commanders and age dynamics add fresh strategies, but some players remain critical of losing the narrative continuity that they're accustomed to in the series. Overall, while there is excitement about potential growth, improvements are necessary to align with long-time fans' expectations.
Positive Points
The core gameplay is considered addictive and draws players in, capturing the "one more turn" feeling.The new age system is praised for offering different goals, providing greater strategic depth, and breaking away from Civ traditional formula.Graphics and visual design are generally deemed stunning, with significant improvements in details and aesthetics making the game immersive.The art and music receive praise for enhancing the overall experience, contributing to a better sense of immersion and engagement.Certain new mechanics such as the implementation of commanders have been positively received for improving combat strategies.Negative Points
The UI/UX is harshly criticized for being unintuitive, confusing, and lacking in vital information.Players find the game unfinished, with numerous bugs and crashes affecting gameplay negatively.The age transition mechanic feels disruptive, resetting progress and causing discontent among players who prefer cohesion and continuity in their civilizations.AI behavior is heavily criticized for inconsistency and lack of challenge even on higher difficulty settings.Monetizing strategies, such as incomplete content gated behind DLCs, have been mentioned as disappointing and greedy.Mixed Points
The innovation with eras and civilization swapping is seen as fresh by some, but others find it disrupts the classic progression and narrative that fans enjoy.Changes to resource and settlement management introduce new strategic elements, but they also lead to frustration due to settlement caps and unfamiliar mechanics.Combat changes through commanders are appreciated for added strategic layers, but some find it complicates what was previously straightforward.Common Themes
The transition system is a major area of contention, with players divided on its role in enhancing or detracting from the gameplay experience.The extensive criticism of the UI suggests a need for significant overhaul to enhance clarity and accessibility.The game's perceived state as unfinished has led to broader discussions on expected standards for full-priced games.There is a notable desire for traditional gameplay elements and complexities, reflecting on a preference for past installment features.Updated 4/4/2025, 8:45:21 PM UTC
